NT lowers age of criminal responsibility
- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 months, 1 week ago by .
Viewing 2 reply threads
Viewing 2 reply threads
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Last weekend saw the Country Liberal Party take victory in the NT elections. One of the party’s key platforms was lowering the age of criminal responsibility from 12 to 10.
Just two years ago, the NT government raised the age from 10 to 12, and now residents seem keen to lower it back down again after a run of high-profile crimes by NT youths.
The move comes at a time when there are large calls around Australia to set a national minimum age of criminal responsibility of 14. Upon winning the election, new NT chief minister Lia Finocchiaro said the policy would be one of the first enacted.
Ms Finocchiaro said it was something her government would enact immediately.
“We’re lowering the age of criminal responsibility to 10 so that young people can be held accountable and that appropriate consequences for their age are delivered, such as boot camps,” she told reporters.
But the NT already has the highest youth incarceration rate in Australia, more than triple that of the next highest state (WA).
Right across the country, indigenous youth are jailed at much higher rates than youths from other cultural backgrounds, leading to accusations that the rule change is actually just thinly veiled racism.
But there is also no denying that crime in the NT has exploded, particularly this year, and that a majority of that increase is coming from young people.
What do you think they should do? Is lowering the criminal age fair?
People have had a gut full of youth crime, no matter who perpetrates it and NT voters clearly expressed that at the ballot box.
Unfortunately due to so many years of soft approach kid glove polices ,the fix will be a very complex and a difficult challenge.
However they have a mandate and must push back against the woke social do gooders and snivel libertarians .
Remember , the devastating and traumatic effects on victims of crime is the same , no matter how old the perpetrator.
One final comment: Why is it that I can safely walk the streets of Singapore at any time of day or night without fear…but I can no longer do this in my own country…who is responsible for that situation.
Responsibility for crimes should have a minimum age of 10, nation wide. Many kids go on crime spree’s, some of them with criminal violence including murder, because the law says they are too young to be aware of what they do. What a load of pussy ideology, by time these kids reach 16, they are hardened criminals.
Lets protect the victims, and apply retribution on all criminals, young and not so young
YourLifeChoices is Australia’s most established and trusted digital publication for the 50+ audience, with a core focus on helping Australians navigate midlife and the retirement landscape.
Since 2000, YourLifeChoices has been providing Australians with essential news, articles and retirement resources – and membership is FREE!
Register for free to access Australia’s leading destination for expert advice, inspiring stories, and practical tips. From health and wealth to lifestyle and travel, find everything you need to make the most of life.
Bonus registration gift: Join today to get our Ultimate Guide to Seniors Rebates in Australia ebook for free!
Already have an account? Sign in