In the tranquil suburbs where the Australian dream of a home with a view often becomes a reality, a recent legal battle has highlighted the potential cost of preserving that dream.
A simple case of landscaping has turned into a full-blown war. Two neighbours are in a legal battle over a row of trees, raising questions about property rights, environmental concerns, and just how far people will go to protect their views.
A neighbourhood dispute in Mount Warrigal, overlooking the serene Lake Illawarra, escalated to the New South Wales Land and Environment Court. Peter Economos, a resident since 2014, found his cherished lakefront views increasingly obscured by several 20-year-old trees on his neighbour’s property.
The trees in question, owned by John and Angie Warden, had grown to a height of 6-7 metres, prompting Economos to seek legal action for their removal.
The Wardens, on the other hand, valued their privacy and the trees’ contribution to their property’s landscape. They were willing to compromise with pruning but wished to maintain the trees’ height for seclusion from their neighbour’s gaze.
The court battle that ensued was not just about the trees but about the principles of property rights, privacy, and the value of a view.
Acting Commissioner Peter Nichols presided over the case, which included an on-site inspection to fully understand the impact of the trees on Mr Economos’ views. In his judgment, Commissioner Nichols acknowledged the importance of the trees for the Wardens’ privacy and the fact that they could be pruned without harming their health.
This resulted in a solution that would restore Mr Economos’ views to a reasonable extent while still preserving the Wardens’ privacy.
The Wardens’ four-bedroom home, a stone’s throw from the lake, embodies the coastal lifestyle many Australians seek. It’s a place where families can enjoy the outdoors and the community amenities nearby. Their three trees, now at the centre of a legal storm, are protected under Shellharbour City Council’s tree management controls, adding another layer of complexity to the dispute.
In a surprising twist, the court ruled that while the trees could be pruned, they would not be removed entirely. Furthermore, the financial burden of the pruning would fall on Economos, the applicant, as the primary beneficiary of the action. This decision underscores the court’s view that maintaining a view should not come at the expense of the neighbour’s privacy and the local environment.
The Land and Environment Court’s final order was for Economos to hire a qualified arborist to prune the trees to a specified height, ensuring compliance with the WorkCover NSW Code of Practice for the Amenity Tree Industry.
The court also mandated that this pruning be repeated every three years, with the Wardens providing access to their property for the necessary work.
This case serves as a cautionary tale for those who might find themselves in a similar predicament. Disputes over views and property rights can lead to costly legal battles, with outcomes that may not always align with one’s initial desires.
For our readers over 50, who may have experienced their fair share of neighbourhood disputes, this story is a testament to the value of maintaining good relations with those next door. It’s also a reminder to be aware of local council regulations regarding trees and property, as these can have significant implications for your home and your views.
Have you ever found yourself in a similar dispute over property views or rights? How did you handle it, and what advice would you give to others facing similar issues? Share your stories and insights with the YourLifeChoices community in the comments below.
Also read: ‘Uncontrollable’ plant sparks $3k legal battle between neighbours
